California voters reject measure to tax the wealth of billionaires
U.S. Court News
California voters have turned down Proposition 40, which would have made the state the first in the nation to tax the net worth of billionaires, after a bitter ballot campaign that drew enormous spending from tech leaders determined to block the tax.
The Associated Press determined Monday that the "no" side had secured enough votes to win. Because most Californians vote by mail and ballots postmarked by Election Day are counted if they arrive within a week, close contests in the state often take days or weeks to resolve.
What the measure would have done
Proposition 40 would have imposed a one-time 5% tax on the wealth of California residents worth more than $1 billion. Most of the revenue was earmarked to offset federal cuts to healthcare funding, with 10% directed to education and food-assistance programs. SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, the union behind the measure, argued the money was needed to make up for an estimated $100 billion in federal healthcare funding the state is expected to lose over five years.
The proposal was the most significant test so far of a long-standing progressive goal: taxing the ultra-rich on their investment holdings, the main source of their wealth, rather than on wages from work.
A lopsided money fight
Opponents outraised supporters by roughly 10 to 1. Building a Better California, a political action committee funded largely by billionaires, raised more than $333 million to defeat the tax and also backed rival ballot measures designed to cancel it out. Google co-founder Sergey Brin alone contributed more than $100 million, close to a third of the committee's total.
The defeat is also a victory for Democratic leaders who opposed the tax, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, a possible 2028 presidential candidate. Critics warned that the measure would have driven ultrawealthy residents out of California.
Supporters plan another attempt
The measure drew backing from progressive figures outside California, including Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who held rallies across the state in the final weeks of the campaign.
The Yes on 40 campaign said its goal was to protect healthcare for Californians and pledged to return with a tax measure in 2028 if patients are not protected. In a statement Monday, proponents said that buying an election is not the same as winning the debate, and called the result only the first round of the fight.
Related listings
-
Justice Department drops bid to force California to set aside disputed ballots
U.S. Court News 11/08/2026The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal court to dismiss its own lawsuit seeking to stop California from counting about 20,000 ballots that the department claimed were sent to noncitizens, until the voters' immigration status could b...
-
Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong sentenced to 10 more years in prison
U.S. Court News 11/05/2026A Hong Kong court on Thursday handed prominent pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong an additional 10-year prison term under the national security law imposed by Beijing, a ruling critics say reflects the sweeping crackdown on the city's once-vibrant de...
-
Judge orders 30-year prison sentence for key figure in Minnesota food fraud
U.S. Court News 11/01/2026A Minnesota restaurant owner has been sentenced to 30 years in federal prison for his role in a massive fraud scheme that stole millions of dollars from a government-funded child nutrition program during the COVID-19 pandemic.Salim Said, the operator...
USCIS Adjusting Premium Processing Fee
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today it is adjusting the premium processing fee for Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker and Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers beginning on Oct. 1, 2018 to more effectively adjudicate petitions and maintain effective service to petitioners.
The premium processing fee will increase to $1,410, a 14.92 percent increase (after rounding) from the current fee of $1,225. This increase, which is done in accordance with the Immigration and Nationality Act, represents the percentage change in inflation since the fee was last increased in 2010 based on the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers.
“Because premium processing fees have not been adjusted since 2010, our ability to improve the adjudications and service processes for all petitioners has been hindered as we’ve experienced significantly higher demand for immigration benefits. Ultimately, adjusting the premium processing fee will allow us to continue making necessary investments in staff and technology to administer various immigration benefit requests more effectively and efficiently,” said Chief Financial Officer Joseph Moore. “USCIS will continue adjudicating all petitions on a case-by-case basis to determine if they meet all standards required under applicable law, policies, and regulations.”
Premium processing is an optional service that is currently authorized for certain petitioners filing Forms I-129 or I-140. The system allows petitioners to request 15-day processing of certain employment-based immigration benefit requests if they pay an extra fee. The premium processing fee is paid in addition to the base filing fee and any other applicable fees, which cannot be waived.
